<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commenti a: Bilateral Symmetry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/2009/05/bilateral-symmetry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/2009/05/bilateral-symmetry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:31:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Di: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/2009/05/bilateral-symmetry/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/?p=826#comment-239</guid>
		<description>I agree with engineering software going open source, however some of the more advanced engineering methodologies, in particular for simulation, still need to validated using test data. This is probably only delaying the process  and certainly requires suppliers to shift their business model towards service supported software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with engineering software going open source, however some of the more advanced engineering methodologies, in particular for simulation, still need to validated using test data. This is probably only delaying the process  and certainly requires suppliers to shift their business model towards service supported software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Di: Luca Fasolo</title>
		<link>http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/2009/05/bilateral-symmetry/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Fasolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/?p=826#comment-148</guid>
		<description>About point 1):
Why do software houses keep on selling &quot;piece of papers&quot; (i.e. licenses) instead of know how? 
If the software is not a simple text editor, to be successfully used it requires a lot of skills, that have to be countinuously mantained and improved. 
In my opinion this could be the future: an open source model, where the software is developed internally by companies,  together with the community, and the main business of the companies is to sell knowledge and project management skills. The software should be a companion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About point 1):<br />
Why do software houses keep on selling &#8220;piece of papers&#8221; (i.e. licenses) instead of know how?<br />
If the software is not a simple text editor, to be successfully used it requires a lot of skills, that have to be countinuously mantained and improved.<br />
In my opinion this could be the future: an open source model, where the software is developed internally by companies,  together with the community, and the main business of the companies is to sell knowledge and project management skills. The software should be a companion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
