I don’t know how the idea of the “One Month Free” software started – whether it has to do with purchase order cycle, or moon cycle.

From the end-user perspective, if the software is a “One-Off” application, one month trial is far too long. The user will  use the application and forget about you and your software. You should offer a shorter trial period, instead. On the other hand, if the software is a long term application, there’s no reason to limit the trial to 30 days. It would be better to implement functional restrictions. Even with limited features, the software will remain on your customer’s desktop, used from time to time.

I think the “one month free license” does not increase software sales, although many companies offer it.

Things to consider before launching a new software company.

1. build a niche website – get credibility
2. ask your family doctor (or a friend, non programmer) for opinions – find out what you’re missing
3. buy your competitors’ products – turn shortcomings into advantages
4. test your prototype with representative users – build not what you think people might want, build what they need.

]]> http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/2008/08/id-have-thought-of-that-moments/feed/ 0 http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/2008/07/code-vs-software/ http://www.giorgiobuccilli.com/2008/07/code-vs-software/#comments Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:58:40 +0000 Giorgio Buccilli http://127.0.0.1/wordpress27/?p=259

People use either “Code” or “Software” as if they were synonyms. Sales-engineers often use “code“. Sales-non-engineers always use “software“.

The distinction between Code and Software is subtle. Programmers write codes, the list of statements that give instructions to computers. The software is the end product: what the users perceive.

When demoing the software, the above difference can be significant. It’s software what our customer is buying.

YouTube succeded over GoogleVideo.

Although YouTube had unique features, and more elegant interface if compared to Google Video, it was its viral impact that made the difference. In YouTube, not only can users know about the popularity of a video posted, they can also make it more popular -via comments, ratings and embeddings. Users can make a video succeed or fail, and this is having a viral effect.

I wonder which comments and ratings would be given to the contents of our corporate websites, if our clients were allowed to.